From: Tony Wye (twye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 28 1999 - 12:21:27 GMT-3
Qestion: The network connecting R1 to R4. Are you using its
natural mask or have you subnetted it down?
If you have subnetted it try using the network statement with a
mask as the end: i.e network 172.16.4.0 255.255.255.0
you might need the word mask in there somewhere.
Take a look at the samples on www.virtualrack.com they
have a 'sample ' problem that needs exactly this mask statement.
I dont know why you need it though.
If this is the correct answer then I'll buy myself a beer !
ToWy
mmirrott@stratos.net,Internet writes:
>From: Mark Mirrotto <mmirrott@stratos.net>
>Subject: BGP and OSPF redistribution
>Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 08:41:41 -0400
>I am having problems in my test lab getting BGP routes to
redistribute >into
>my routing tables. Here is the scenario:
>R1 is running OSPF over a multipoint frame relay connection to R2 and
>R3.
>This is OSPF area 0
>R2 and R3 are also connected via their token ring interfaces in OSPF
>area
>1.
>R1 also has an EBGP connection to R4 over a point-to-point frame
relay
>connection. R4 is advertising the network connected to its ethernet.
>R1 is mutually redistributing OSPF and BGP. The rest of the OSPF
>routers
>see the BGP route from R4, and R4 sees the rest of the OSPF network.
>The
>problem is R1 is not propagating the network connecting R1 and R4
(the >EBGP
>network) even though there is a network statement under the BGP
routing
>process.
>If I extend the OSPF area 0 to include the network connecting to R4,
>everything works fine. I guess the bottom line is I need to get this
>route
>into the routing tables somehow without using static routes, and
>without
>using OSPF. Any ideas?
>Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:36 GMT-3