How to interpret this ??

From: Chuah Eng Wee (chuahew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 30 1999 - 02:28:50 GMT-3

• Next message: Hutchinson, Ian: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Previous message: Poston, Barry: "RE: IOS consistency during lab exam(congratulation to Barry Poston)"
• Next in thread: Hutchinson, Ian: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Hutchinson, Ian: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Ron Trunk: "Re: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Bill Carter: "Re: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Chuah Eng Wee: "Re: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Derek Fage: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi..

How do u interpret the following :

No native IPX should pass the link between r3 and r5
- I would interpret as no IPX between r3 and r5, we
need to create a tunnel.
OR
- No IPX/RIP, but can have IPX/EIGRP or NLSP

No dynamic traffic IPX traffic should be exchanged between R3 and R4
- THis one is more obvious. I would interpret as no NLSP, no IPX/EIGRP, no
IPX RIP. We can only use static routes.

Let me know if u have other interpretations.

THanks
Eng Wee

• Next message: Hutchinson, Ian: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Previous message: Poston, Barry: "RE: IOS consistency during lab exam(congratulation to Barry Poston)"
• Next in thread: Hutchinson, Ian: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Hutchinson, Ian: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Ron Trunk: "Re: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Bill Carter: "Re: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Chuah Eng Wee: "Re: How to interpret this ??"
• Maybe reply: Derek Fage: "RE: How to interpret this ??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:43 GMT-3