From: Jason Aarons (jaarons@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Aug 10 1999 - 21:29:26 GMT-3
Actually I tried 0.0.0.252; it isn't a valid reverse valid wildcard mask.
Remember that OSPF uses a wildcard mask so the valid masks are below
255
127
63
31
15
7
3
1
0
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Scott O'Donnell" <scotto@iworksys.com>
>
Or the Network statement could look like this.
network 172.16.254.1 0.0.0.252 area 0
Although it doesn't lend itself to easy reading.
Scott
> Try a wildcard mask of 0.0.0.3
>
> Antonio
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Antonio Sabella/USC/AXE on 08/10/99
10:36
> AM ---------------------------
>
> nobody@groupstudy.com on 08/10/99 10:05:23 AM
> To: jaarons@hotmail.com@internet@WTAXE,
> ccielab@groupstudy.com@internet@WTAXE
> cc:
> Subject: Re: OSPF network; inverse mask question....
>
> Your wild card mask is not including s0..
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "Jason Aarons" <jaarons@hotmail.com>
> Reply-To: "Jason Aarons" <jaarons@hotmail.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OSPF network; inverse mask question....
> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 18:14:37 EDT
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 172.16.254.1 255.255.255.252
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip ospf network point-to-point
> !
> router ospf 1999
> network 172.16.254.0 0.0.0.252 area 0
> !
> ip classless
> ip subnet-zero
>
> 1#show ip ospf int s0
> Serial0 is up, line protocol is up
> OSPF not enabled on this interface
>
> if I change the router ospf 1999, network 172.16.254.0 0.0.0.255 it
works.
> What am I not seeing ?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:46 GMT-3