From: Jason Aarons (jaarons@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 14 1999 - 15:26:00 GMT-3
   
Here is a map of the choices.  Choice A has not been installed (yet) but
neeed to know if it will create a better EIGRP metric than Choice B.  Also,
this is good stuff..since I included load with EIGRP into the picture..
Choice A.
Source---FE---Router1--DS3--Router2--FE---Router3---OC12---Router4---FE----Dest
ination
Choice B.
Source----FE---Router1----T1----Router4----FE----Desination
After mapping it out, I added some details below and corrected some errors -
jason
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Joe Soricelli" <jsoricelli@ccci.com>
To: "Jason Aarons" <jaarons@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: EIGRP route calculation
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 08:33:56 -0400
Jason-
A little more detail please.  First, a map would be good.  Second, are you
trying to figure out why one route was choosen over another?
-joe
------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Aarons <jaarons@hotmail.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 5:47 PM
Subject: EIGRP route calculation
 >Problem:
 >
 >Using K1, K2, K3 (bandwidth, delay, load) determine whether the metric via
 >Router1-Router2-Router3 is better Router1s direct T-1 (and given
 >load).
 >
 >
 >ROUTER1#show int serial5/0
 >Serial5/0 is up, line protocol is up
 >  MTU 4470 bytes, BW 44210 Kbit, DLY 200 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
 >
 >ROUTER2#show int faste0/0
 >FastEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
 >  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
 >
 >ROUTER3#show int pos5/0/0
 >POS5/0/0 is up, line protocol is up
 >   MTU 4470 bytes, BW 155000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, rely 255/255, load 3/255
 >
Router4#show int faste5/1/0
FastEthernet5/1/0 is up, line protocol is up
   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
 >
 >
 >! Router1 a direct T-1 to destinateion with metric 2181634
 >router1#show ip route x.y.z.a
 >Routing entry for x.y.z.a/24
 >  Known via "eigrp 260", distance 110, metric 2181634, type internal
 >  Redistributing via eigrp 120
 >  Last update from x.y.z.b on Serial3/2, 00:33:11 ago
 >  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
 >  * x.y.z.b, from x.y.z.b, 00:33:11 ago, via Serial3/2
 >      Route metric is 2181634, traffic share count is 1
 >      Total delay is 20200 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
 >      Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
 >      Loading 7/255, Hops 2
 >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:53 GMT-3