From: Brian Van Benschoten (vader@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 17 1999 - 12:30:19 GMT-3
do the other 2 routers in your AS also have the confederation commands ?
confederation identifier
confederation peers
all three routers in your confederation need to agree on the identifier and
the corresponding peer statements.
----- Original Message -----
From: Scott O'Donnell <scotto@iworksys.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 1999 10:21 AM
Subject: BGP Confederation Problem?
> I've configured a BGP confederation but ran into a problem.
>
> I have R2 with the following BGP config.
> router bgp 6502
> bgp confederation identifier 275
> bgp confederation peers 6505 6507
> network 150.5.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0
> neighbor 150.5.25.5 remote-as 6505
> neighbor 150.5.25.5 next-hop-self
> neighbor 150.5.27.7 remote-as 6507
> neighbor 150.5.27.7 next-hop-self
> neighbor 150.5.32.3 remote 341
>
> When I look at the BGP table on neigh 150.5.32.3, it shows
> the routes for the confederation with the AS_PATH containing
> the internal (65xx) AS numbers.
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *> 150.5.2.0/24 150.5.32.2 0 0 275 i
> *> 150.5.3.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
> *> 150.5.5.0/24 150.5.32.2 0 275 6505 i
> *> 150.5.7.0/24 150.5.32.2 0 275 6507 i
>
> My impression was that the internal AS (65xx) would be dropped as
> it was advertised to a EBGP peer.
>
> Yes?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:21:53 GMT-3