From: Stephens, Paul [Prof.Serv] (Paul.Andrew.Stephens@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 08 2000 - 10:04:45 GMT-3
Thanks Bill, Scott had hit the nail on the head. I had been stupid and
forgotten to add the loopbacks to the routing process, and hey presto it
didn't work !!!
Just goes to show you need to step back a bit and take another look every
now and then
Paul Stephens
UK INI Network Consultant
Networks and Systems Integration Services
Compaq Computer Ltd
*mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com
<mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com>
* Mobile +44 7818 457948
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wade [mailto:wwade@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 13:02
To: Stephens, Paul [Prof.Serv]; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP Confederations
Paul,
No reason why you can't use loopbacks pointed to by your
"neighbor x.x.x.x" cmd when using confederations.
I assume you're using the "neighbor update-source loopbackx"
cmd.
Bill
At 07:34 AM 2/8/00 , Stephens, Paul [Prof.Serv] wrote:
>Hi All
>
>This is my first post, but I've been lurking around for
months and learning
>a lot. I've got my second lab attempt in Brussels next week
and I've been
>doing some BGP work.
>Could someone clarify for me, I seem to remember reading
that you can't use
>loopbacks for confederations is that correct ??
>If that's not right what am I doing wrong, I set up a
confederation and had
>it working with physical interfaces so I thought I'd try
and do it with
>loopbacks, now it doesn't work
>Any help appreciated
>
>Paul Stephens
>
>UK INI Network Consultant
>Networks and Systems Integration Services
>Compaq Computer Ltd
>
>*mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com
><mailto:paul.andrew.stephens@compaq.com>
>* Mobile +44 7818 457948
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Fear
[mailto:Russell.Fear@patent.gov.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 7:54
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IS-IS
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just panicking now as I've less than 14 days
to go to my
>second attempt.
>
> I know that the lab can contain anything but
some subjects
>are less likely than others to figure largely.
>
> Is this the case with IS-IS ?
>
> Russell
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:22:53 GMT-3