Re: vpn's

From: Kyle Galusha (kgalusha@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 19 2000 - 23:44:53 GMT-3

• Next message: Brad: "RE: IS-IS and OSPF weirdness"
• Previous message: Joe Martin: "Re: IS-IS and OSPF weirdness"
• Maybe in reply to: robert patterson: "vpn's"
• Next in thread: Dave Gahm: "Re: vpn's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
   Most Cisco documents discuss GRE tunnels with or with encryption
   (e.g., IPSEC) as a VPN. If you don't have at least 11.3T IOS you
   can't do IPSEC anyway. So my thought is Tunneling (data segregation)
   is a valid VPN.
   Kyle
   At 03:15 PM 4/19/2000 -0500, robert patterson wrote:
   
     At my last lab, I ran across a VPN configuration issue.
     I had always thought that VPN's required ipsec software
     but the router was not so enabled. Maybe this is a perception
     problem on my behalf, but I have had the same comments from
     other recent visitors to the lab. I guess the question is what
     can be considered a valid VPN. A tunnel, a tunnel with
     authentication....
     Robert Patterson
     Senior Systems Engineer
     KentDatacomm

• Next message: Brad: "RE: IS-IS and OSPF weirdness"
• Previous message: Joe Martin: "Re: IS-IS and OSPF weirdness"
• Maybe in reply to: robert patterson: "vpn's"
• Next in thread: Dave Gahm: "Re: vpn's"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:14 GMT-3