From: Stanley Seow (stanley_seow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 22 2000 - 09:16:28 GMT-3
Title:
Ryan,
Two methods,
On R3 :
dlsw mac-address 000a.000b.000c remote-peer ip-address X.X.X.X
or
On R2 :
Alternatively, you can specify a single dlsw icanreach statement in
the remote router MAC address. This information is sent to all remote
routers as part of the capabilities exchange.
On R2 put :
dlsw icanreach 000a.000b.000c FFFF.FFFF.FFFF
Make sure you filter this so that it does not get out to R1
FFFF.FFFF.FFFF match hosts right ??
I got an UNCONFIRM on the static reachability on R3, is this okay
since there is no such host as 000a.000b.000c.
Links as below:
http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/ibm_r/b
rprt2/brdlsw.htm#xtocid2223993
Stanley
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf
Of
> Ryan B
> Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2000 10:47 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSw Questions..
>
>
> R1 -> E0
> R2 -> Ring 2 & E0
> R3 -> Ring 1
>
>
> The requirement is to setup DLSw between these three routers. But,
only
> allow R1's E0 to access R2's E0, and Ring 1 to access Ring 2.
> Would this be
> right?
>
> (This is R2's config)
> dlsw port-list 1 Ethernet0
> dlsw ring-list 2 rings 2
> dlsw remote-peer 1 tcp 192.168.5.5 lf 1500 ! R1
> dlsw remote-peer 2 tcp 192.168.3.3 ! R3
>
> The next one has me totally stumped... How would I setup R3 so
explorer
> packets for the mac 000a.000b.000c would not get forwarded to Ring
2? If
> this was SRB without DLSw it could be done with an
> access-expression, but if
> I add an an inbound access-expression to R3's To0 I would also deny
that
> explorer from getting to R1's ethernet network... Any ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ryan
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:15 GMT-3