From: LASSERRE Grégory (gregory.lasserre@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2000 - 11:31:18 GMT-3
   
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De:   LASSERRE Grégory
> Date: samedi 22 avril 2000 15:01
> Ŕ:    'Maljure, Sanjay'
> Cc:   'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Objet:        RE: Challenge : HSRP
>
>
> Hi everybody,
> i think we found a winner :
>
> Maljure found the solution..!
> Congratulations !
>
> However, here is an extension to this question :
> what's happen if you are not allowed to use the
> mapping to R3's s0.1 interface as tunnel destination ?
> What is the other alternative ?
>
> Cheers
> Greg.
>
> Ps: Maljure, thanks to have wait a little bit to give the answer ;o))
>
>       -----Message d'origine-----
>       De:     Maljure, Sanjay [SMTP:smaljure@cibernetworks.com]
>       Date:   vendredi 21 avril 2000 20:10
>       Ŕ:      'LASSERRE Grégory'
>       Cc:     'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>       Objet:  RE: Challenge : HSRP
>
>       Hi Gregory,
>
>       We cannot "track" the s0.1 interface on R1 because even if the PVC
> between
>       R1 and R3 fails, the line protocol will stay up (because s0.1 is a
>       point-to-multipoint interface)
>
>       So how about this... (I haven't tried this one but looks promising)
>
>       Create a tunnel interface on R1 and R3 with the tunnel source as
> R1's s0.1
>       and tunnel destination as R3's s0.1
>       If the PVC between R1 and R3 fails, then R1 would lose the mapping
> to R3's
>       s0.1 interface, which means the tunnel interface would go down....
>
>       So we can "track" this tunnel interface and decrement the priority
> of R1...
>
>       Again, I haven't tried this but what do u think?
>
>       Sanjay
>
>
>
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: LASSERRE Grégory [mailto:gregory.lasserre@arche.fr]
>       Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:57 AM
>       To: ccielab groupstudy
>       Subject: Challenge : HSRP
>
>
>
>       Hi guys,
>
>       I've got a challenging question i worked on last week regarding
> HSRP.
>       The solution is not so trivial, and it took me a while to find the
> answer
>       (so i hope you won't find the solution too quickly ;o)
>
>       Just let's go :
>
>       R1,R2, and R3 routers are full-meshed over FR,
>       using point-to-multipoint interfaces.
>
>       R1 and R2 are also connected via Ethernet.
>       R3 has an LAN interface (Eth, or Token. As you wish)
>
>       You are running HSRP between R1 and R2 ; and R1 is your Active
> router by
>       default.
>
>       What you want to do is to configure the routers so that
>       R2 becomes the Active router IF and ONLY IF the DLCI between R1 and
> R3 fall
>       down.
>
>       Note: You have to run OSPF on the FR cloud (R1, R2, R3 are in Area
> 0)
>
>       Good luck,
>       and please don't ridiculate me finding the solution in 3 minutes ;o)
>
>       Cheers.
>       Greg.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Gregory LASSERRE              Tel. : +33 1 69 18 98 53
>       Network Engineer                          Fax : +33 1 69 28 55 01
>       ARCHE Groupe SIEMENS         Std  : +33 1 69 18 32 32
>       FRANCE
>
>       E-mail : gregory.lasserre@arche.fr
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:23:15 GMT-3