From: David Ankers (d.ankers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Sep 11 2000 - 19:55:04 GMT-3
Mark, Group,
I've got a question..... I orginally stated in my mail that EIGRP
redistributes defaults directly, this was quoted fromthe Doyle book, I'm
just reading the EIGRP FAQ (
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrpfaq.html ) and:
"Q. Does EIGRP require a default network to propagate a default route?
A. Although EIGRP can propagate a default route using the default network
method, it isn't required. EIGRP redistributes default routes directly."
Now, I've tried this with a static default to Null0 and it is *NOT*
propagated, however, other documents I've read state that the 0.0.0.0 route
is not understood by eigrp which would then be correct. I *guess* that both
Doyle and Cisco FAQ mean that if a default route exists via another routing
protocol i.e. rip it will be automatically redistributed? Please can some
guru that really understands this clear this up as it's time to put this
thread to bed.
Regards,
Dave.
----- Original Message -----
From: "mark salmon" <masalmon@cisco.com>
To: "David Ankers" <d.ankers@cable.a2000.nl>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRp and default routes
> I also see another reason why your router advertises 10.0.0.0. You have
> no interfaces configured in 10.0.0.0. I have interfaces configured in
> 10.0.0.0.
>
> David Ankers wrote:
> >
> > Won't show up as the candiate default in the other routers configs but
>
> Mark Salmon
> Cisco Systems Inc
> Phone:773-695-8235
> Pager:800-365-4578
> email: masalmon@cisco.com
> Empowering The Internet Generation.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:24:55 GMT-3