From: John Conzone (jkconzone@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 19:02:19 GMT-3
Jack, DV will use the secondary. If he added a secondary on the link
matching the major network (was it 15.15.x ?) and subnet with the same mask,
the network would now be contiguous, or "healed". The 15 net is 24 bits on
both sides of the link between R1 and R2.
If I missed something in his question (very possibIe <G>) I apologize.
Doyles book has a nice section regarding this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jack Heney" <jheneyccie@hotmail.com>
To: <jkconzone@home.com>; <tkc9789@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: route redistribution
> How would you solve this using secondary addressing? I thought routing
> updates were sourced from the primary address on the interface....If this
is
> the case, how will you get IGRP to advertise the routes when they have a
> different length subnet mask?
> Thanks,
> jack
>
>
> >From: "John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com>
> >Reply-To: "John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com>
> >To: "tom cheung" <tkc9789@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: Re: route redistribution
> >Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:31:44 -0400
> >
> > Secondary addressing onthe link between r1 and r2,or deafult router
> >and
> >IP classless.
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "tom cheung" <tkc9789@hotmail.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 7:10 PM
> >Subject: route redistribution
> >
> >
> > > I'm playing with the following scenario and was unable to get
> >redistribution
> > > to work. Any suggestions will be appreciated.
> > >
> > > ospf igrp loop0
> > > -----------r1------------------r2----15.15.15.15/24
> > > 15.15.x.x/24 10.1.12.192/28
> > > 10.1.x.x/24
> > > 10.1.x.x./29
> > >
> > > r1 runs ospf/igrp and r2 runs only igrp. The 15.15.x.x network is
> > > discontiguous. What's a good solution to solve this? Thanks.
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:29 GMT-3