From: John Conzone (jkconzone@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2000 - 14:25:38 GMT-3
Without getting into specifics, one is clearly told what commands are
not acceptable to use.
If you are not told explicitly not to use a command, its fair game.
I would use every command in my arsenal to get the job done. Someone is
getting bad info. The test is hard enough without worrying about this. Read
the lab and you'll know what you can't use. If it ain't explicitly
prohibited, use it!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Foster, Kristopher" <KFoster@C1Communications.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: Loosing marks for extra commands
> Sorry, I should have been more clear. The no sync command is viewed in
the
> same light as static routes (it takes half the fun out! :D). This tidbit
> came from one of the ccie netgun technical experts at global knowledge.
So
> basically don't get into the bad habit of slapping in the no sync command
> everytime you get stuck.
>
> Kris,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark salmon [mailto:masalmon@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:00 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: Loosing marks for extra commands
>
>
> I suspect that you are speaking from personal experience, but I am
> surprised that if the lab does not explicitly forbids a command, that
> using it will cost you points.
>
> "Foster, Kristopher" wrote:
> >
> > If you use 'no synchronization' in your BGP config's you will not get
the
> > marks.
> >
> > Kris,
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McNutt, Steve [mailto:Steve.McNutt@ahlcorp.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 9:57 AM
> > To: 'Shaun Nicholson'; ccielab
> > Subject: RE: Loosing marks for extra commands
> >
> > I'm dying to know too, because there are some things I do as a matter of
> > habit that may or may not be needed in some situations, but they save
time
> > by freeing me up to concentrate on other things. some examples:
> >
> > using frame maps for for everything and not depending on inverse-arp.
> > turning off auto-summary on routing protocols (i'll tell you when to
> > summarize!! hehe)
> > unless a specific requirement I usually turn off synchronization for
BGP.
> > if the practice scenario gives me some wiggle room on statics (like only
> > specifying that I can't create a default route) I create null routes for
> > summary addresses.
> >
> > I can do without these things, but it really speeds setup and
> > troubleshooting because I've eliminated some problematic features up
> front.
> >
> > Of course I'm also the Ethernet Nazi at work and I will turn off any
port
> > that has an unlabled cable, no port description, or is set to
> autonegotiate.
> > Better for it to not work at all than to have people coming to me with
> crazy
> > problems all the time.
> >
> > -steve
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shaun Nicholson [mailto:Shaun.Nicholson@kp.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 8:44 AM
> > To: ccielab
> > Subject: Loosing marks for extra commands
> >
> > This may be a NDA violation but I read here on this group a few weeks
ago
> > that you can loose marks for using extra unnessesary commands that were
> not
> > needed. I dont know if this is true or not can anyone shed some light on
> > this statement.
> >
> > For example I like to remove any chance of frame relay inverse arp
working
> > so I use the no frame-relay inverse-arp command and then do frame maps
> from
> > my hub router to all my spokes and then my spokes to my hub and then to
> the
> > spokes. Would this be considered extra commands? is this something the
> > proctor could answer on the day if its an NDA issue?
> >
> > Anyone able to help? Please dont shoot yourself in the foot if it is and
> NDA
> > issue just dont answer.
> >
> > Shaun
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:30 GMT-3