From: Richard Yang (ryang@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 03 2000 - 11:02:31 GMT-3
Thank you. I think the dlsw is the better choice.
-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Menga [mailto:Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 8:28 PM
To: 'Richard Yang'; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: Transparent bridge problem
Use DLSW:
---------R1--------------R2-----------------R3--------------R4--------
bridge 1 <--------------- WAN (DLSW) -------------> bridge 1
e.g.
R1:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.4.1.1
dlsw bridge-group 1
int s0
ip address 10.1.1.1
int e0
bridge-group 1
bridge 1 protocol ieee
This creates a "port" for the DLSW peer in the bridge........
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Yang [mailto:ryang@maxlink.com]
Sent: Friday, 3 November 2000 4:19 a.m.
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Transparent bridge problem
Hello,
R1 and R4 have a bridge group, if I want to connect these bridge group
together, one solution is add " bridge-group 1" in all routers wan
interface. Do you know any other solution ?
bridge 1
-----R1-----------------R2-----------------R3---------------------R4--------
bridge 1
wan wan wan
Richard K. Yang
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:41 GMT-3