From: Wu,Jiang (wujiang@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 01:32:45 GMT-3
So how about defaut routes generated by a dynamic routing protocol like OSPF or
EIGRP? I think they are not forbidden. Correct me if I am wrong.
Wu
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Baumgartner <kbaumgar@cisco.com>
To: <wujiang@bj163.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: confusion on bridging
> I would say that "no static routes" only applies for routers since
> the catalyst switches only have static routing.
>
> Kevin
>
> >
> > Chuck,
> > I have a bit confusion on the difference between "static route", "default r
oute" and "default gateway". If it is forbidden to use "default gateway", how c
an I get attached to a cat5000's sc0 interface from a host on another subnetwor
k?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wu
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Tony Olzak <aolzak@buckeye-express.com>
> > To: Chuck Larrieu <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>; Erick B. <erickbe@yahoo.com>; Ccie
lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 10:10 AM
> > Subject: Re: confusion on bridging
> >
> >
> > > Chuck,
> > >
> > > The command "ip routing" is on by default and hidden from the configurati
on.
> > > Take two routers and configure them with just ip addresses. Then place a
> > > loopback on R1. Place a default static route on R2 and ping the loopback
on
> > > R1. You will be able to ping successfully even though there are no routin
g
> > > protocols running on R1.
> > >
> > >
> > > Configs:
> > >
> > > R1
> > > interface loopback 0
> > > ip address 2.2.2.2
> > > !
> > > interface ethernet 0
> > > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.0.0.0
> > >
> > > R2
> > > interface ethernet 0
> > > ip address 1.1.1.2 255.0.0.0
> > >
> > > You actually need to turn off IP routing in global config or in a bridge
> > > command (IRB, etc.).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
> > > To: "Erick B." <erickbe@yahoo.com>; "Ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 6:15 PM
> > > Subject: RE: confusion on bridging
> > >
> > >
> > > > How will it route ip if there are no static routes defined, or no routi
ng
> > > > protocol enabled, with networks placed into that routing process?
> > > >
> > > > I believe the show ip route will yield a "routing table" consisting of
> > > > connected interfaces. Traffic will not "route" between devices. I.e
> > > > forwarding will not take place.
> > > >
> > > > Am I wrong again?
> > > >
> > > > Chuck
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > > Erick B.
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 2:49 PM
> > > > To: David T. Absalom
> > > > Cc: Ccielab
> > > > Subject: Re: confusion on bridging
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > It'll route IP and bridge everything else if you have
> > > > a IP address assigned to the interface and don't have
> > > > 'no ip routing' globally.
> > > >
> > > > --- "David T. Absalom" <dabsalom@lucent.com> wrote:
> > > > > I'm confused (nothing new...)
> > > > >
> > > > > If an interface is in a bridge group but has an ip
> > > > > address and the "no ip
> > > > > routing" statement has NOT been issued
> > > > > (additionally, no crb or irb), will
> > > > > it route or bridge. Is ip routing on by default
> > > > > when an ip address is added
> > > > > to an interface?
> > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:41 GMT-3