Re: Dialer map question

From: Eric Hauptman (erichn@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 02:52:22 GMT-3


   
Tony,

Yeah, that's what I thought, but it works. Here's the relevant part of the
configs:

router1

interface BRI0
 ip address 172.16.13.133 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer idle-timeout 30
 dialer map ip 172.16.13.134 name router2 broadcast 8358661
 dialer-group 1
 isdn switch-type basic-ni
 isdn spid1 0835866201 8358662
 isdn spid2 0835866401 8358664
 ppp authentication chap

router2

interface BRI0
 ip address 172.16.13.134 255.255.255.0
 no ip directed-broadcast
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer idle-timeout 30
 dialer hold-queue 10
 dialer-group 1
 isdn switch-type basic-ni
 isdn spid1 0835866101 8358661
 isdn spid2 0835866301 8358663
 ppp authentication chap

Yet a ping to 172.16.13.134 results in....

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 172.16.13.134, timeout is 2 seconds:
.!!!!
Success rate is 80 percent (4/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 36/170/408 ms
router1#
09:24:51: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up
09:24:51: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 8358661
09:24:52: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface BRI0:1, changed
state
to up
router1#
09:24:57: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 is now connected to 8358661
router2

Any ideas???

Eric

Tony Olzak wrote:

> You need the dialer map for PPP authentication.
>
> Try your scenario with chap ON and no dialer map. You'll probably have
> problems getting the call to go through.
>
> Tony
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Hauptman" <erichn@ustman.com>
> To: "Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2000 11:33 PM
> Subject: Dialer map question
>
> > Using ISDN across and ISDN simulator I am able to make calls from
> > Router1 to Router2 with Router2 having a "dialer map" statement. Yet,
> > the Cisco web site says:
> >
> > "Note: A dialer map command is necessary even if the router does not
> > initiate outbound calls"
> >
> > So, what is the downside of not having the "dialer map" on the called
> > router? Thanks.
> >
> > Eric
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3