Re: catalyst multicast

From: Sam Munzani (sam@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 12:24:15 GMT-3


   
   If you understand multicast routing properly "set multicast router
   X/x" is needed if you want to statically configure a cat port for
   multicast routing. Following link will make you understand multicast
   routing step-by-step.
   
   www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/22.html
   
   Sam
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: micklegao@netease.com
   
   To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
   
   Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:52 AM
   
   Subject: catalyst multicast
   
   hi,
   
      i have some questions not very clear about catalyst multicast.
   
   
   
      example:
   
   
   
       R1-E0 ---- CATALYST 5000-----E0--R2
   
                       |
   
                       |
   
                       |
   
                       E0
   
                       |
   
                       R3
   
   
   
   
   
     R1 's E0 CONNECT cat5000 's port 1/1
   
     r2 's e0 connect cat5000 's port 2/1
   
     r3 's e0 connect cat5000 's port 3/1
   
   
   
     port 1/1-2 belongs to vlan 1
   
     port 2/1-10 belongs to vlan 2
   
     port 3/1-10 belongs to vlan 3
   
   
   
     if i wanna to efficiently switch the multicast packet, i had better
   use cgmp on cat5000, so i config
   
   
   
     "set cgmp enable " on cat5000, and "ip cgmp " on very router's e0
   
   
   
     i think this will make cat5000 switch only the multicast packet to
   the port which is connected a multicast client, not use broadcast
   anymore.
   
   
   
      if the vlan3 has no multicast client , how to config , so that the
   cat5000 will not permit multicast group on vlan3, but also permit
   vlan1 and vlan2 has multicast group??
   
   
   
      i have seen a command " set multicast router X/x " , but i don't
   understand the command. it say the command is used to config staticly
   which port is connected to a multicast router . why config this ??? i
   don't think it is nessary to config this on cat5000, maybe i am wrong.
   
   
   
   
   
      somebody must know this , please shed me a light.
   
   
   
      thanks a lot!!
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3