RE: RIP default routes (& default-information originate)

From: Philip Neeson (Philip.Neeson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 06 2000 - 17:21:15 GMT-3

• Next message: Ronnie Royston: "RE: ?? : Multicast ping replies"
• Previous message: Justin Menga: "RE: NetBIOS/DLSW filtering"
• Maybe in reply to: Philip Neeson: "RE: RIP default routes (& default-information originate)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi Fred,

I just tried that also. It doesn't seem to matter if the
"default-information originate" command is used of not. If I don't use it
the default route is still redistributed from OSPF into Rip and propagated
throughout my Rip network. From all the testing I've done this command
seems to have no effect.

Thanks,

Philip.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Ingham [mailto:fningham@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: 06 November 2000 19:48
> To: Philip Neeson; LBOng; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: RIP default routes (& default-information originate)
>
>
> The following produces a default route for rip in r4. The configuration
> is on r1. r1 and r4 are connected via frame relay with a /24 subnet.
> Other routers are running OSPF.
>
> r1:
> router rip
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 3
> passive-interface Serial0/0.123
> network 172.16.0.0
> default-information originate
>
> r4:
> router rip
> network 172.16.0.0
> network 172.17.0.0
> !
> ip classless
>
> hth, Fred.
>

• Next message: Ronnie Royston: "RE: ?? : Multicast ping replies"
• Previous message: Justin Menga: "RE: NetBIOS/DLSW filtering"
• Maybe in reply to: Philip Neeson: "RE: RIP default routes (& default-information originate)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3