RE: IPSec Dynamic

From: Steve McNutt (lpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 07 2000 - 00:35:05 GMT-3


   
actually, IKE with pre shared keys is the easiest way to set up a basic
tunnel. don't have to generate hashes or any of that nonsense.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Heney [mailto:jheneyccie@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:32 PM
To: lpd@jacksonville.net; aolzak@buckeye-express.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPSec Dynamic

If I have to set up IKE I am going to cry. Seriously.
Jack

>From: "Steve McNutt" <lpd@jacksonville.net>
>Reply-To: "Steve McNutt" <lpd@jacksonville.net>
>To: "Tony Olzak" <aolzak@buckeye-express.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: IPSec Dynamic
>Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:11:56 -0500
>
>ohmygawd I hope I don't they don't go that deep into ipsec on me hehe.
>It's
>a cool feature that I wish FW-1 had though.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Tony Olzak
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 9:39 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IPSec Dynamic
>
>
> Does anyone have a sample config for IPSec with dynamic maps?
>
>
> Tony
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3