From: Sam Munzani (sam@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 07 2000 - 00:50:57 GMT-3
Couldn't agree more. I don't know what's difficult about IKE.
Sam
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Steve McNutt wrote:
> actually, IKE with pre shared keys is the easiest way to set up a basic
> tunnel. don't have to generate hashes or any of that nonsense.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Heney [mailto:jheneyccie@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:32 PM
> To: lpd@jacksonville.net; aolzak@buckeye-express.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IPSec Dynamic
>
>
> If I have to set up IKE I am going to cry. Seriously.
> Jack
>
>
> >From: "Steve McNutt" <lpd@jacksonville.net>
> >Reply-To: "Steve McNutt" <lpd@jacksonville.net>
> >To: "Tony Olzak" <aolzak@buckeye-express.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: IPSec Dynamic
> >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:11:56 -0500
> >
> >ohmygawd I hope I don't they don't go that deep into ipsec on me hehe.
> >It's
> >a cool feature that I wish FW-1 had though.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> >Tony Olzak
> > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 9:39 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IPSec Dynamic
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have a sample config for IPSec with dynamic maps?
> >
> >
> > Tony
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:42 GMT-3