From: McNutt, Steve (Steve.McNutt@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 07 2000 - 16:43:26 GMT-3
I can confirm that the rule does apply to IBGP. I ran into this last
night on CCBootcamp lab 12. The rule makes sense given the goal of
IBGP is to maintain AS consistancy.
Lab 12 is cool because it gave me an idea of how confusing things can
get when working with confederations. The scoping of some rules are
changed, but some are not, and the confederation makes it harder to
tell if you are not meeting an AS wide "IBGP" type rule.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Jastak [mailto:ejastak@gobosh.cc]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:14 PM
To: 'Sam Munzani'
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: BGP Route-maps
I think that rule only applies to iBGP. Was the route-map applied to
an iBGP or eBGP neighbor?
- Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Munzani [mailto:sam@munzani.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 10:07 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP Route-maps
Hi Group,
As everybody might have read it in Halabi and bunch of other sources.
"Inbound Route-map does not work when used with matching IP address".
Today I experimented and it works inbound also. Violating the BGP (or
Halabi) rule for route-maps.
Sam
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:43 GMT-3