RE: Access-list response time.

From: Jennings, Mike (Mike.Jennings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Nov 09 2000 - 15:27:07 GMT-3

• Next message: Fred Ingham: "Re: DLSW Netbios Name Filters"
• Previous message: Forest Riek: "Re: help_upgrade IOS via aux or con"
• Maybe in reply to: sgupta22@xxxxxxx: "Access-list response time."
• Next in thread: Jay Hennigan: "Re: Access-list response time."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
   
    Title: RE: Access-list response time.
    
   Remember, when a packet matches a line in an access list it is either
   permited or deny at that moment. The router does not check it against
   any other lines in the access list.
   
   If a packet matches line one in #1, it is permited ... period. It
   would never get to line 2 in #1.
   -----Original Message-----
       From: sgupta22@csc.com [SMTP:sgupta22@csc.com]
       Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 9:07 AM
       To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
       Subject: Access-list response time.
       Hi team,
       can any one shed some light on these two in terms of response
       time?
       1. access-list 101 permit tcp host 172.16.1.1 host 192.168.10.1 gt
       1800
           access-list 101 deny tcp host 172.16.1.1 host 192.168.10.1
       gt 1900
       2. access-list 101 permit tcp host 172.16.1.1 host 192.168.10.1
       range 1800
       1900
       thx in advance
       -sudhanshu

• Next message: Fred Ingham: "Re: DLSW Netbios Name Filters"
• Previous message: Forest Riek: "Re: help_upgrade IOS via aux or con"
• Maybe in reply to: sgupta22@xxxxxxx: "Access-list response time."
• Next in thread: Jay Hennigan: "Re: Access-list response time."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:43 GMT-3