Re: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes

From: Kevin Gannon (kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 11 2000 - 06:27:39 GMT-3

• Next message: Curtis Phillips: "A way to determine router S/N remotely?"
• Previous message: James Chen: "Re: ccbootcamp Lab 1"
• Maybe in reply to: Rajeevan Chamackalil: "Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Next in thread: Sam Munzani: "Re: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
CEF can doper packet load balancing ;-) which makes it useful for some
things.

Regards,
Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: <JKimes1@aol.com>
To: <Rajeevan@euclidnet.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes

> I would assume yes and no...
>
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
>
> routing would load balance, but if ip route-cache or ip route-cache cef
were
> turned on, then it would continue to use the same interface and not toggle
(I
> think).
>

• Next message: Curtis Phillips: "A way to determine router S/N remotely?"
• Previous message: James Chen: "Re: ccbootcamp Lab 1"
• Maybe in reply to: Rajeevan Chamackalil: "Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Next in thread: Sam Munzani: "Re: Load Balancing through equal cost Default routes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:44 GMT-3