From: Wu, Jiang (wujiang@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 05 2000 - 11:30:21 GMT-3
Umm...
Parallel bridges must have unique number. It's time to sleep...
----- Original Message -----
From: Wu, Jiang <wujiang@bj163.com>
To: Justin Menga <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: SR/TLB
> The bridge numbers need not to be unique throughout the SRB network. While th
e ring numbers need to. The source-route bridge uses ring-bridge-ring combinati
on to recognize routes. So you can select bridge number as you like -- in acces
sable range though.
>
> Am I wrong again?
> Wu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Justin Menga <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 5:25 PM
> Subject: SR/TLB
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a few questions on SR/TLB
> >
> > sample config:
> >
> > source-bridge ring-group 1000
> > source-bridge transparent 1000 2000 2 1
> >
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> >
> > int to0
> > source-bridge 10 2 1000
> >
> > int e0
> > bridge-group 1
> >
> > In the above config, the problem I have understanding is the transparent
> > command, particularly the last two numbers. The third number is the "bridg
e
> > no of the bridge that leads to the transparent bridging domain". Does this
> > mean the bridge as specified in the source-bridge command under to0. THe
> > fourth number is the number of the TB-Group - I understand this.
> >
> > I have seen configs that use different bridge numbers than those under the
> > interfaces - will this still work?
> >
> > Last question: In a SRB network (without DLSW), do the bridge numbers have
> > to be unique?? (I know the ring numbers need to be)
> >
> > Regards - 14 days in SYDNEY.....
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:58 GMT-3