From: Lachlan Kidd (lkidd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 27 2000 - 20:14:12 GMT-3
Hi Ed,
The way I would do it (and I may be wrong) is to summarise the first th
ree
routes as /22 and leave the .12.0 address alone. I know that it's not a /16
summary but I can't really see another way of doing it.
Regards,
Lachlan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jobson, Ed
Sent: Thursday, 28 December 2000 12:52:PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Route summarisation question
I wonder if anyone can help with this problem.
I have 4 class C RIP routes being redistributed into OSPF x.y.1.0, x.y.2.0,
x.y.3.0 & x.y.12.0. To summarise these to a class B I use the summary
address command which obviously generates a 16 bit route from null 0 and
appears in the other OSPF routers tables. But if I need to also let through
the 12.0 route still as a class C, can I do it this way? If so how, or do I
need to approach this differently?
Thanks.
Eddie Jobson.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:11 GMT-3