From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 19:19:11 GMT-3
So what does "default passive default" do? I am familiar with passive
interface.
Is it related to this?
Also why do you need to do
no pass lo0
no pass e0
Is this not the default anyway?
Sorry I am just a little confused with what you are doing with these three
commands?
Kevin
At 04:04 PM 1/11/01 -0600, Ronnie Royston wrote:
>Insurance. That's just my way. I like have the routing protocol advertise
>out interfaces that I specify only. In this isolated senario, it doesn't
>make a difference.
>
>...just habit (and a good one, I believe).
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kevin Baumgartner [mailto:kbaumgar@cisco.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 1:51 PM
>To: Ronnie Royston; 'Vikas Gupta'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: RIPv2/EIGRP thru tunnel
>
>
>At 03:21 PM 1/11/01 -0600, Ronnie Royston wrote:
>
> >There a few ways to do it, but here's one.
> >
> >R1:
> >int lo0
> >ip addres 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> >!
> >int tu0
> >ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255
> >tunnel source lo0
> >tunnel dest 2.2.2.2
> >!
> >router eigrp 10
> >network 1.1.1.1
> >network 3.3.3.3
> >network (local ethernet)
> >default passive default
> >no pass lo0
> >no pass e0
>
> So why the need for
>
> default passive default
> no pass lo0
> no pass e0
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:27 GMT-3