From: Bill Dellamar (wdellamar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:28:29 GMT-3
your access list 1 references a 41.0.0.0 network,
whereas the static routes reference a 44.0.0.0 and
45.0.0.0
Bill
--- "Virnoche, Phil" <phil.virnoche@attws.com> wrote:
> r3 (BGP 2) ---------------- r4 (BGP 1)
> Prior to adding the filter1 out statement I could
> see both the static routes
> on r4 at r3 when i issued an "sh ip bgp"
> command,.............
> After adding the filter, and issuing a "clear ip bgp
> * " command and letting
> the two re-establish, I get nothing at r3.....
> ideas?
>
>
> R4:
> router bgp 1
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> redistribute static
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 remote-as 2
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 ebgp-multihop 2
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 route-map filter1 out
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 44.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
> ip route 45.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
> no ip http server
> !
> access-list 1 permit 41.1.1.0
> access-list 2 permit 200.200.200.0
> route-map filter1 permit 10
> match ip address 1
> !
> route-map filter1 permit 20
> match ip address 2
> set metric 5
> !
>
>
>
> Philip G. Virnoche CCNA
> Network Engineer - AT&T Wireless
> phone: 425.580.5239
> cell: 206.601.3134
>
> "HAM AND EGGS - A day's work for a chicken; A
> lifetime commitment for a
> pig."
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:41 GMT-3