From: Virnoche, Phil (phil.virnoche@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 23 2001 - 20:42:11 GMT-3
Thanks Michelle !!!!
Shit,..... that was easy...... I must have fat fingered it !!! That, along
with mnay hours of lab studing !!!
See what a second set of eye's can do......
-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle T [mailto:mtruman@mn.mediaone.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:35 PM
To: Virnoche, Phil
Subject: Re: BGP problem
Phil,
The 2 access lists you are using do not seem to match the static routes at
all.
Where do networks 41.1.1.0 and 200.200.200.0 reside?
Michelle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Virnoche, Phil" <phil.virnoche@attws.com>
To: "CCIE newsgroup (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:07 PM
Subject: BGP problem
> r3 (BGP 2) ---------------- r4 (BGP 1)
> Prior to adding the filter1 out statement I could see both the static
routes
> on r4 at r3 when i issued an "sh ip bgp" command,.............
> After adding the filter, and issuing a "clear ip bgp * " command and
letting
> the two re-establish, I get nothing at r3..... ideas?
>
>
> R4:
> router bgp 1
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> redistribute static
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 remote-as 2
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 ebgp-multihop 2
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 10.33.1.65 route-map filter1 out
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip classless
> ip route 44.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
> ip route 45.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
> no ip http server
> !
> access-list 1 permit 41.1.1.0
> access-list 2 permit 200.200.200.0
> route-map filter1 permit 10
> match ip address 1
> !
> route-map filter1 permit 20
> match ip address 2
> set metric 5
> !
>
>
>
> Philip G. Virnoche CCNA
> Network Engineer - AT&T Wireless
> phone: 425.580.5239
> cell: 206.601.3134
>
> "HAM AND EGGS - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a
> pig."
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:41 GMT-3