Re: ISL Encapsulation & 2651's

From: Bernard Dunn (dunn@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 10:49:50 GMT-3


   

Jason,

Vaguely recall there was a version of IOS in which code was left out for
support of ISL.. Not due to feature set ("+" images, Vs non-"+").

Regards

Bernard.

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Jason Whelan wrote:

>
> For what it's worth-
> I had a hard time getting subinterfaces configured on my 2651, when I
> entered command encapsulation isl 1,
> it didn't like the encap argument.
> If I tried to add an ip to the sub-int, it gave me a long winded message
> about vlans etc.
> I have seen the posts that explain IP+ image is neccessary for ISL, but I
> didn't have enough flash or memory for ip+.
> However, the IP/IPX/AT IOS does work, and didn't require any more mem/flash
> than IP.
> Perhaps more people have had this problem.
> Cheers
> Jason
>
>
> Jason Whelan, MCSE,MCNE,CCNP
> Lan/Wan Engineer
> Logic Communications
> ww.logic.bm
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:46 GMT-3