From: mark salmon (masalmon@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 15:05:24 GMT-3
I can see by the thread that I was not clear enough. I did not mean to
imply that the bridge group number was shared by different routers. I
was saying that the same bridge group number was NOT used on different
interfaces on the same router.
"Michael E. Flannagan" wrote:
>
> bridge group numbers are locally significant. You create a bridge within
> the router. If two routers are physically connected via some media, there
> is no need for the bridge numbers to be the same on both ends because both
> routers are already getting the data from that wire.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> C i s c o S y s t e m s Michael E. Flannagan
> | | Network Consulting Engineer
> ||| ||| Research Triangle Park, NC
> ||||||| ||||||| (919) 392-4550
> .:|||||||||||:.:|||||||||||:. mflannag@cisco.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Bob Chahal wrote:
>
> > I satnd to be corrected but...
> >
> > I think your right and I'd lab this myself but off the top of my head just
> > configure dlsw bridge-group on both routers to be the same group no. as tha
t
> > configured on r1-e0 and r2-e2
> >
> > Something like
> >
> > r1
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > bridge 1 pro iee
> > bridge 2 pro iee
> > !
> > int e0
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > int e1
> > bridge-group 2
> > !
> > int e2
> > bridge-group 2
> > !
> > int e3
> > bridge-group 2
> >
> > r2
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > int e2
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > other ethernets whatever
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: mark salmon <masalmon@cisco.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:00 PM
> > Subject: DLSW and Ethernet
> >
> >
> > > I have the following scenario:
> > >
> > > r1 (multiple ethernets, let us say e0 to e4)
> > >
> > > r2 (also multiple ethernets (e0 to e4)
> > >
> > > How can I set up DLSW+ between r1-e0 and r2-e2 with no connections
> > > between the other ethernets?
> > >
> > > One way I can think of is place the ethernets I wasn't to connect in a
> > > bridge group on the respective routers. I would then create additional
> > > bridge groups on each router and place the other interfaces in those
> > > bridge groups. My dlsw bridge group statement would only have one
> > > bridge group on each router configured.
> > >
> > > Am I an the right track?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mark Salmon
> > > Network Support Engineer - SBC OP HQ
> > > Cisco Systems Inc
> > > 8735 W. Higgins Road Suite 300
> > > Chicago IL 60631
> > > Phone:773-695-8235
> > > Pager:800-365-4578
> > > email: masalmon@cisco.com
> > > Are you ready?
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:47 GMT-3