From: Nodir Nazarov (nodir@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 15:15:14 GMT-3
Thanks everyone who responded however I am little confused with "ip
next-hop".
when I do "set ip next-hop" this is what I got:
............
2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
match
2d04h: CEF-IP-POLICY: fib for address N.N.N.N is with flag 0
2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
rejected - normal forwarding
............
When I do "set interface" with SAME EXACT ACL I got:
............
2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D, len 84, FIB policy
match
2d04h: IP: s=S.S.S.S (FastEthernet0/0.1), d=D.D.D.D (Serial2/0/16 :0), len
84, FIB policy routed all
...........
Tried to disable CEF - "ip next-hop" didn't work either. Does it make
difference how "next-hop" is learned when you do policy routing ?
Nodir
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Frank Liang wrote:
> If the first interface specified with the set interface command is down, the
> optionally specified interfaces are tried in turn.
>
> I understand that the second interface is used as backup, not load
> balancing.
>
> Frank
>
>
> >From: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> >Reply-To: Nodir Nazarov <nodir@datatone.com>
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: policy routing with load balancing
> >Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:45:26 -0500 (EST)
> >
> >Hello, The Group !
> >
> >How can I configure more than 1 "set interface" in route-maps for policy
> >routing so that outgoing traffic would be load balanced ? I did
> >
> >route-map balance permit 110
> > match ip address 171
> > set interface Serial2/0/16:0 Serial2/0/17:0
> >!
> >
> >But traffic matching ACL 171 goes only through first configured interface.
> >What is the purpose of having more than one interface statements in "set"?
> >
> >Nodir
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:34 GMT-3