From: Tom Lancaster (Tom.Lancaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2001 - 17:56:49 GMT-3
Out of curiosity, does anyone know WHY Cisco has only implemented ISL on FE?
My understanding of the spec (based on white papers on CCO) is that the ISL
protocol supports Token Ring, FDDI, etc. and in fact goes to great lengths
to support things like RIF so that frames from different topologies can
coexist (encapsulated) on an uplink, but none of these were ever
implemented.
thx,
-tom
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew [mailto:arousch@home.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:43 PM
> To: Tariq Sharif; Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
> Subject: Re: Is ISL on 2610 possible?
>
>
> 2610 cannot do ISL.
>
> At 05:51 PM 2/15/01 +0000, Tariq Sharif wrote:
> >Has anyone got ISL on 2610 working? Fastether NM is
> recognized & commands
> >(int f1/0.1, encap isl 1 etc) accepted but can't do router
> on a stick VLAN
> >interrouting.
> >
> >Have got the same card working in 3620 (same configs). Just
> curious if poss
> >on 2610. Cisco web says can't, but commands are picked up....
> >
> >Many thanks & regards.
> >
> >Tariq Sharif
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:28:50 GMT-3