From: Devon Watkins (devon_watkins@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Feb 25 2001 - 22:45:11 GMT-3
While I am a notoriously paranoid individual, I can not see a lab proctor
having the time or energy to monitor this list on a regular basis, if he/she
was not required to. I am not saying they could not or that no one would, I
am just thinking of the time factor and the volume of traffic. Heck, I
BARELY have enough time to keep up with this list, and I am pretty motivated
by personal reward to try and know all I can, in preparation for the exam.
Maybe I am wrong, its been known to happen once or twice, or a thousand
times ;).
BTW, I agree with the lazy theory of human endeavor. Sounds pretty logical
to me.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 7:17 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Inverse-Arp + Map Statement
>>
Maybe one of the lab proctors could just post the labs, it would be so much
easier to study that way! Come on guys, I know you follow this list, please?
<<
there was a rumor going around for a while that not only did the lab
proctors watch this list, but they also noted names of those who
participated regularly, as well as topics discussed. Then when such a person
showed up for the lab, they received a scenario especially tailored for
them, including detailed requirements for topics they had discussed on the
list.
Much as I believe in the lazy theory of human endeavor ( people will only do
that work which they perceive will allow them to be even lazier in the
future ), I worry that computer technology has changed a lot of this.
Databases with these kinds of cross references aren't all that much work any
more.
I know there are several folks here who use pseudonyms and less easily
traced web mail accounts for a number of reasons. Maybe we all should?
Chuck
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:01 GMT-3