From: Chuck Larrieu (chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 28 2001 - 02:36:43 GMT-3
The purpose of the distribute-list 4 is to prevent the eigrp summary router
172.16.0.0 from being redistributed back into the eigrp process from the
ospf process.
My recollection is that in general there were problems with the solution
provided. Artifact routes. Routes disappearing.
Wait - here it is - my notes from a lab I did on this scenario. Issue -
distribute list did not solve the problem of the "phantom summary
182.18.0.0" being redistributed back into eigrp. I needed a route map to do
so.
Also, you might want to take a peek at the archives for the month of
January. There were several good posts from Nigel on this particular
scenario .
I vaguely recall doing this scenario a couple of times, and in one try
finding that if I filtered out the summary, then one routing domain or the
other was hosed. Can't locate notes. Is this what you are seeing?
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nodir Nazarov
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 7:57 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: slattery/burton, advanced ip, redistr. ex.10
Hello, The Group,
This question is regarding Example 10 of redistribution on Slattery/Burton
"Advanced IP routing..."
Can anybody explain me (who did this example) what is practical
significance of "distribute-list 4 out" on NewYork router (example 10,
page 372, line 33). Everything has been relatively smooth until this
"distribute-list". I was sure I did not need it.
Thank you,
Nodir
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:08 GMT-3