From: Daryl Wan Wai Meng (darylwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Apr 05 2001 - 04:02:13 GMT-3
Just to add on...
456 and 457 are serialization packets.
For snapshot with suppress-statechange-updates, it waits for the timing as
specified before bringing the line up. So why deny serialization packets. It
would not activate anyway. I usually just use "dialer-list 1 protocol ipx
permit", it seems to work.
If you use snapshot without the command "suppress-statechange-updates", this
would make sense as the serialization packets would bring up the line
periodically and snapshot would work its magic.
Does anyone else have different views on snapshot? This question has been on
my mind for quite a while.
Daryl
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Leung
To: devender.singh@cmc.cwo.net.au; jianggx@transcentury.com.cn;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 4/5/01 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: Does I really need these commands in the config of IPX Snapsh
ot routing??
I can get ipx snapshot working on Ccbootcamp#7 without those lists.
Marc's
solution use them as well.
Frank
>From: Devender Singh <devender.singh@cmc.cwo.net.au>
>Reply-To: Devender Singh <devender.singh@cmc.cwo.net.au>
>To: Jiang <jianggx@transcentury.com.cn>, CCIELAB
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Does I really need these commands in the config of IPX
Snapsh
>ot routing??
>Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:08:08 +1000
>
>I agree with you. I seen this kind of configs at other places on CCO as
>well.
>
>Devender Singh
>BE(Hons), CCNP
>IP Solution Specialist
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jiang [mailto:jianggx@transcentury.com.cn]
>Sent: Sunday, 25 March 2001 11:19
>To: CCIELAB
>Subject: Does I really need these commands in the config of IPX
Snapshot
>routing??
>
>
>Hello, all,
>
>In CCO "http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/129/21.html",I think there
>are some mistakes in the configuration. the dialer-list is the
>following:
>access-list 901 deny 0 FFFFFFFF 0 FFFFFFFF 457
>access-list 901 deny 1 10.0000.0000.0001 0 10.ffff.ffff.ffff 453
>access-list 901 deny 4 10.0000.0000.0001 0 10.ffff.ffff.ffff 452
>access-list 901 deny 4 FFFFFFFF 0 FFFFFFFF 456
>access-list 901 permit 0
>access-list 901 permit 1
>access-list 901 permit 4
>access-list 901 permit 5
>access-list 901 permit 17
>access-list 901 permit 20
>
>I think they shouldn't deny sap and rip(453 and 452), because one
>role of snapshot is handling such thing, they can't trigger the
>call even you don't deny them. I tested it in my lab, just deny 457,
the
>routers worked well. Although the config of the cco can also work, but
>I think there shouldn't be added. The questions is if you understand
>the concept of snapshot routing. Before I read this config, I think
>I understand sanpshot very well, but this config really make me
>puzzled.
>
>Do you think my understanding of snapshot routing is right or not? If
>I am wrong, pls correct me.
>
>Another question, what is sap 456, should I deny it or not?
>
>
>Best regards,
>Guoxing Jiang mailto:jianggx@transcentury.com.cn
>
>
>**NOTE** All LAB SWAP messages should now be sent to the
>LAB SWAP Message board on groupstudy.com.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:40 GMT-3