From: Wang, Roger (Roger@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 17 2001 - 20:16:38 GMT-3
   
Glen,
Disabling split horizon did the trick.  Hmm, I wonder why.  Thanks for your
help.
Rog
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Lavers [mailto:glavers@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 6:43 PM
> To: Wang, Roger; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IGRP route advertisement
>
>
> I have it working without disabling split-horizon, different
> address same
> prefixes and concept. Go figure.
> Glen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Glen Lavers
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:13 AM
> To: Wang, Roger; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IGRP route advertisement
>
>
> I just tried it and it works, but you have to disable
> split-horizon on s0.
> Here's an example and debugs:
> -Glen
> R1#sh run
> !
> hostname R1
> !
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> !
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
>  ip address 172.16.77.130 255.255.255.128
>  no ip directed-broadcast
> !
> interface Serial0/0
>  ip address 172.16.66.5 255.255.255.128 secondary
>  ip address 172.16.66.4 255.255.255.0
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  no ip split-horizon
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  no fair-queue
> !
>
> R3#sh run
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration:
> !
> version 12.0
> service timestamps debug uptime
> service timestamps log uptime
> no service password-encryption
> !
> hostname R3
> !
> !
> ip subnet-zero
> !
> !
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
>  no ip address
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  shutdown
> !
> interface Serial0/0
>  ip address 172.16.66.7 255.255.255.128 secondary
>  ip address 172.16.66.6 255.255.255.0
>  no ip directed-broadcast
>  no ip mroute-cache
>  clockrate 64000
>
>
>
> Debugs: notice at first it only sends subnet 172.16.66.0 out
> e0/0 the once
> split-horizon is disabled it sends out 172.16.77.128 out s0/0:
>
> 00:47:38: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial0/0
> (172.16.66.4)
> 00:47:38: IGRP: Update contains 0 interior, 0 system, and 0
> exterior routes.
> 00:47:38: IGRP: Total routes in update: 0 - suppressing null update
> 00:48:53: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0/0
> (172.16.77.130
> )
> 00:48:53:       subnet 172.16.66.0, metric=8476
> 00:48:53: IGRP: Update contains 1 interior, 0 system, and 0
> exterior routes.
> 00:48:53: IGRP: Total routes in update: 1
> 00:48:53: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial0/0
> (172.16.66.4)
> 00:48:53: IGRP: Update contains 0 interior, 0 system, and 0
> exterior routes.
> 00:48:53: IGRP: Total routes in update: 0 - suppressing null update
> R1#
> R1#conf t
> Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
> R1(config)#int s0/0
> R1(config-if)#no ip spl
> R1(config-if)#^Z
> R1#
> 00:49:27: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console
> R1#
> R1#
> 00:50:13: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Ethernet0/0
> (172.16.77.130
> )
> 00:50:13:       subnet 172.16.66.0, metric=8476
> 00:50:13: IGRP: Update contains 1 interior, 0 system, and 0
> exterior routes.
> 00:50:13: IGRP: Total routes in update: 1
> 00:50:14: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial0/0
> (172.16.66.4)
> 00:50:14:       subnet 172.16.66.0, metric=8476
> 00:50:14: IGRP: Update contains 1 interior, 0 system, and 0
> exterior routes.
> 00:50:14: IGRP: Total routes in update: 1
> 00:50:14: IGRP: sending update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial0/0
> (172.16.66.5)
> 00:50:14:       subnet 172.16.77.128, metric=1100
> 00:50:14:       subnet 172.16.66.0, metric=8476
> 00:50:14: IGRP: Update contains 2 interior, 0 system, and 0
> exterior routes.
> 00:50:14: IGRP: Total routes in update: 2
> R1#
> R1#
>
>
>
> R3#sh ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M -
> mobile, B - BGP
>        D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
>        N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
>        E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
>        i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * -
> candidate
> default
>        U - per-user static route, o - ODR
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
>      172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks
> I       172.16.77.128/25 [100/8576] via 172.16.66.5,
> 00:01:09, Serial0/0
> C       172.16.66.0/25 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> C       172.16.66.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> R3#
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Glen Lavers
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:43 PM
> To: Wang, Roger; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IGRP route advertisement
>
>
> RE: IGRP route advertisementWhat I meant is try placing
> 172.16.66.5/25 for
> example on s0 as a sec, as well as placing a /25 sec on the
> other end of the
> serial line. This should carry the e0 /25 route right through
> to the routing
> table of the router hanging off s0.
> Glen
>
>
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Wang, Roger [mailto:Roger@inteqnet.com]
>   Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:19 PM
>   To: 'Glen Lavers'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>   Subject: RE: IGRP route advertisement
>
>
>   I've tried that.  The network of the secondary IP address
> (using, say,
> 172.16.70.4 /25) gets advertised, but somehow 172.16.77.4/25
> still did not.
>
>   Rog
>
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: Glen Lavers [mailto:glavers@cisco.com]
>   > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:14 PM
>   > To: Wang, Roger; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>   > Subject: RE: IGRP route advertisement
>   >
>   >
>   > You can place a secondary address with a /25 on the serial
>   > int, it should
>   > then advertise both /24 and /25 addresses. Give it a try, I
>   > know I've used
>   > this technique the otherway around for making a poorly
>   > addressed VLSM to
>   > FLSM topo work.
>   > Cheers,
>   > Glen
>   >
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
  > Wang, Roger
  > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 8:22 PM
  > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
  > Subject: IGRP route advertisement
  >
  >
  > Hi, all,
  >
  > I have searched high and low in the archive and can't seem to
  > find anything
  > about it...
  >
  > I have a question about IGRP route advertisement.  We all
  > know that the
  > advertisements from IGRP are only with the mask of the interface:
  >
  > 172.16.77.4/25--e0(R4)s0--172.16.66.4/24
  >
  > R4 is running IGRP.  Is there way so that the /25 subnet (e0) can be
  > advertised out interface s0 (on /24 subnet)?  The other end of s0 is a
  > router running both IGRP and OSPF where redistribution occurs.
  >
  > Thanks,
  >
  > Rog
  > **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:48 GMT-3