From: Julie Stewart (stewartj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 25 2001 - 16:20:16 GMT-3
You're correct. R3 should see R4's loopback interfaces as IA routes. The
solution is not to redistribute connected. Let me give you a hint. What
command do you use in ospf when you have an area (i.e., area 44) which is on
a router not directly connected to area 0? You probably came 'virtually'
close to figuring it out already ! :-)
HTH,
Julie Stewart
CCIE #7227
SAIC, Inc.
stewartj@saic.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "rsevier" <rsevier@zealousolutions.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:54 PM
Subject: Bootcamp lab 1
> I am completing bootcamp lab 1 and I have a question R3 and R4. R4's
> loopback interfaces are in area 44 and R4's e0 interface is in area 3. R4
> has a serial link to R3. The serial link from R3 that is connected to R4
is
> in area 3 and R3's other serial interface is in area 0. My question is
why
> can't I see R4's loopback interfaces (that are in area 44) in R3's routing
> table? If I redistribute connected in R4 then I can see them, but they
are
> E2 type routes and that isn't what the lab is looking for. I have set up
> policy routing for everyting to see everything, but shouldn't R3 see R4's
> loopback interfaces? I thought I should see the subnets as IA routes in
> R3's routing table.
>
> l0---- s1 s1 s0
> area 44 > R4 ---------- R3 ---------
> l1---- | area 3 area 0
> |
> e0
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:29:56 GMT-3