FW: Virtual Links over Frame - panic over!

From: Tariq Sharif (tariq_sharif@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 14:07:40 GMT-3


   
My mistake/oversight. R5 was patched into the same cat as R2. And I've
not created the vlans. So frame had nothing to do with the error message I
was getting. Still good to bear in mind that keep router vlan interfaces
shut until vlans have been created otherwise...

Many thanks & regards.

Tariq Sharif

-----Original Message-----
From: Rogell, Dennis [mailto:Dennis_Rogell@milgo.com]
Sent: 03 May 2001 17:20
To: 'Tariq Sharif'
Subject: RE: Virtual Links over Frame

Make sure your transit id is 10 and you have it mapped to the right router
id. Also make sure you have the same network types. It would also be a good
to post your configs for the group.

Dennis Rogell
Email : dennis_rogell@milgo.com
Phone: (954) 846-5128

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tariq Sharif [SMTP:tariq_sharif@btinternet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 08:51
> To: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
> Subject: Virtual Links over Frame
>
> R2 is a frame hub router. Frame is area 10 & R2 is attached to a LAN which
> is in area 0. R5 a frame spoke router with frame interfaces (area 10) & a
> token interface in area 50. So I need a V link. Configured as normal it
> does
> not work. R2 --- R5 is frame with physical interfaces & ip ospf network
> p-2-mpoint.
>
> Why would it not work? Is there anything special like sub interfaces
> required?
>
> Many thanks & regards.
>
> Tariq Sharif
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
> had a name of winmail.dat]
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:30:33 GMT-3