From: McCallum, Robert (Robert.McCallum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 04 2001 - 18:51:39 GMT-3
Shoot me down in flames now if need be BUT I am having a lapse in
concentration i.e. too late at night.... the rules of route picking... is it
not directly connected b4 longest match? or does longest match win overall?
I am sure it is the latter but my brain is now questioning me as if I am
wrong !!!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Pickell, Aaryn [mailto:Aaryn.Pickell@getronics.com]
Sent: 04 June 2001 20:56
To: 'Juan Carlos Muruchi'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Administrative distance
Not that I know of.
You can sort of work around this, though... if you have a /24 network
directly connected, and you want to use a different route to get to that
segment, you can use two /25 routes in your routing table. That way, the
longest match will supercede and you'll take the other path, instead of the
directly connected.
It's up to you to generate the two /25 routes, though. Statics, or inject
them into a routing protocol somewhere else... whatever.
Aaryn Pickell - CCNP ATM, CCDP, MCSE
Senior Engineer - Routing Protocols
Getronics Inc.
Direct: 713-394-1609
Email:aaryn.pickell@getronics.com
This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
this message and attachments. Thank you.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan Carlos Muruchi [mailto:jmuruchi@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:36 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Administrative distance
>
>
> Does anyone know if it is posible to change
> administrative distance of a directly conected
> network?
> If it is posible, how can you do it?
> Regards,
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:17 GMT-3