From: Ilya Mazhara (willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 10:27:13 GMT-3
Once again - it should be redistributed.
Is Eth 0 up?
sh ip rip da
turn off filtering in ospf...
Haohong Lin wrote:
>
> why another DV routing protocol-- IGRP-- can redistribute connected netwoks?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "garry baker" <fallow46@yahoo.com>
> To: "Haohong Lin" <hhlin@szskzj.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: redistribute rip to ospf
>
> If the route you wish to redistribute is a connected
> route you will need to redistribute connected.
>
> Garry
> --- Haohong Lin <hhlin@szskzj.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to redistribute rip route '172.17.59.80/28'
> > to ospf process, the
> > route entry was connected route. After I pressed
> > commands as needed, I found
> > that '172.17.59.80/28' wasn't in ospf database. Why?
> >
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 172.17.59.81 255.255.255.240
> > !
> > router ospf 10
> > area 0 authentication message-digest
> > redistribute rip subnets route-map filterrip
> > network 172.17.59.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > network 172.17.59.18 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > !
> > router rip
> > passive-interface Async1
> > passive-interface Serial0
> > passive-interface Serial1
> > network 172.17.0.0
> > !
> > access-list 2 permit 172.17.59.80 0.0.0.15
> > !
> > route-map filterrip permit 10
> > match ip address 2
> > !
> > !
> > R4#sh ip ospf da
> >
> > OSPF Router with ID (172.17.59.81) (Process
> > ID 10)
> >
> > ...<omit>
> > Type-5 AS External Link States
> >
> > Link ID ADV Router Age Seq#
> > Checksum Tag
> > 172.17.59.48 172.17.59.81 69
> > 0x80000006 0x63D3 0
> > 172.17.59.64 172.17.59.81 69
> > 0x80000006 0xC264 0
> > R4#
> >
> > Another question: how to test rip authentication
> > functioning.
> >
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Haohong Lin
> > **Please
> > read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:19 GMT-3