From: Bob Chahal (bob.chahal@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 16:03:48 GMT-3
Dave
if you configure ppp chap on both ends this will work.
I can't quite member the exact reason but it's something to do with the
called router no being able to reconcile the remote name in it's dialer map
to the calling router. By using chap it manages to resolve this.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Anderson" <dma@cisco.com>
To: "Daniel C. Young" <danyoung99@mediaone.net>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: isdn: no dialer-group, no good?
> I have also ran into something interesting in the last couple of
> days....with only 2 weeks left from today until D-day
> I am using dialer map statements on my calling and receiving routers and
> have an interesting problem. On my calling router I have the following:
> R1---calling router
> int bri 0
> ip address 133.1.100.5 255.255.255.252
> encap ppp
> dialer map ip 133.1.100.6 name router2 broadcast 5552222
> dialer-group 1
>
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>
> R2----receiving router
> int bri 0
> ip address 133.1.100.5 255.255.255.252
> encap ppp
> dialer map ip 133.1.100.5 name router1 broadcast
> dialer-group 1
>
> dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>
> When I use the above configs the calling router is not able to ping the
> remote router. However if I add a dial string to the end of the dialer
map
> on the receiving router the ping works fine. This is not what I am after
> though. I do not want to the receiving router to have a dial string,
> because I don't want it to be able to initiate a call.
> Any suggestions?
>
> Any input is appreciated.
> Thanks,
> David
>
> At 11:29 PM 6/5/2001 -0700, Daniel C. Young wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >Scenario:
> >I had one router with a dialer-group statement calling another router
> >without the dialer statement. Dialer map and ppp authentication were in
> >place. The call is placed, but no traffic can go through. Pings fail, no
> >route exchange. When I configured 'dialer-group' on the called router
> >WITHOUT a 'dialer-list' statement, the pings were successful and routing
> >tables were updated.
> >
> >Question:
> >Is a 'dialer-group' statement necessary in order to pass traffic through
an
> >isdn line? Or, was this an IOS bug?
> >
> >List of equipment used:
> >ISDN Simulator: Emutel Solo
> >Calling router: 2503 with 12.0(5)T ED Enterprise with IPSec 56
> >Called router: 4500 with 12.0(17) GD Enterprise with F/W and IPSec 56
> >
> >Many thanks,
> >
> >Daniel C. Young
> >Sr. Network Engineer
> >CCNP (ATM, Security & Voice Specialist),
> >CCDP, CCSE, MCSE+I
> >
> >SBC Internet Data Center
> >(949) 221-1928 Work
> >(714) 350-8945 Cell
> >young@pobox.com
> >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:19 GMT-3