From: Fred Ingham (fningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2001 - 20:44:01 GMT-3
Shane: These are the same OSPF Non-Broadcast network types and you
should have no difficulty establishing adjacencies. If you want R2 to
be the DR a better practice is to set the R1 ip ospf priority to 0.
Then the neighbor statement is only needed on R2 and the priority and
poll-interval options can be dropped.
I read the original post as: how to correct mismatched OSPF network
types without using a network command.
How about a tunnel?
Cheers,Fred.
SFeldberg@edeltacom.com wrote:
>
> Try this to establish OSPF adjacency and DR on R2:
>
> hostname R1
> !
> int s0.1 multipoint
> ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.248
> frame-relay interface-dlci 123
> ip ospf priority 1
> !
> router ospf 1
> neighbor 10.1.1.1 priority 254 poll-interval 30
>
> << Frame Relay Switch >>
>
> hostname R2
> !
> int S0
> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.248
> ip ospf priority 254
> !
> router ospf 1
> neighbor 10.1.1.2 priority 1 poll-interval 30
>
> Frame maps and/or inverse arp will be required for the layer 3
> connectivity, depending on the lab requirements.
>
> Steve
>
>
> Shane Miles
> <smiles@ftdat To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'"
> a.com> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent by: cc:
> nobody@groups Subject: alternative to ip ospf
network command
> tudy.com
>
>
> 08/10/2001
> 03:59 PM
> Please
> respond to
> Shane Miles
>
>
>
> If I have a network type mismatch over a Frame Relay PVC the
> only
> way I know to fix it is by using the "ip ospf network" command. I don't
> like knowing only one method. Is there an alternative? I read suggestions
> about somehow using a route-map but they had no examples and I haven't been
> able to figure out how.
> --
> Shane P. Miles
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:48 GMT-3