BGP redundant RR

From: Yves Fauser (Yves@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2001 - 05:19:39 GMT-3

• Next message: Ikram Muhammad: "unsubscribe"
• Previous message: Daniel C. Young: "CCIE #7999"
• Next in thread: Peter Van Oene: "Re: BGP redundant RR"
• Maybe reply: Peter Van Oene: "Re: BGP redundant RR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Group,

is there any magic about Redundant Route Reflectors other than :

1. Give both RR an identical Cluster ID
2. Give both RR the same peering relationsship with other RR clients an
non RR clients

I'm still searching for an hidden trap, but maybe I'm just getting to
nervous.
Thanks, Yves
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: Ikram Muhammad: "unsubscribe"
• Previous message: Daniel C. Young: "CCIE #7999"
• Next in thread: Peter Van Oene: "Re: BGP redundant RR"
• Maybe reply: Peter Van Oene: "Re: BGP redundant RR"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:31:51 GMT-3