Re: 500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511

From: Bill Cropper (billcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Aug 31 2001 - 07:28:16 GMT-3

• Next message: CCIE yong: "summary-address"
• Previous message: Clarke.J: "about jeff doyle's routing TCP/IP vol 2"
• Maybe in reply to: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\): "500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
I am using one quite successfully. Saved alot of money too!

---
   Bill Cropper
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Bryan Long (Richmond VA) wrote:
> Has anyone used the 500 CS as their terminal server as opposed to the 2509 or
> 2511? Or if anyone has advice that would be great.
>
>
> Thanks!!
>
>
> Bryan
> **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html

• Next message: CCIE yong: "summary-address"
• Previous message: Clarke.J: "about jeff doyle's routing TCP/IP vol 2"
• Maybe in reply to: Bryan Long \(Richmond VA\): "500 CS instead of 2509 or 2511"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:01 GMT-3