From: David Knot (david_knot@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 17:09:28 GMT-3
Brian
Agree that passive-interface won't work!
I've tried distance command on Router A but since the
route is directly connected one, it doesn't sort it
out.
Thanks
--- Brian Hescock <bhescock@cisco.com> wrote:
> David,
> The response someone gave you with
> passive-interface won't work but
> what should work (if you have older code) is use the
> "distance" command
> to set the admin distance higher so the ospf route
> is preferred.
> You''ll still have the route in the eigrp topology
> table but it won't
> be in the routing table.
>
> Brian
>
> David Knot wrote:
>
> >Hi guys
> >
> >Can someone help with this OSPF <-> EIGRP
> >redistribution lab exercise.
> >
> >Router B has 2 serial 0, serial 1 & Ethernet 0
> >interfaces. The serials are running OSPF on them &
> >they lead to OSPF IP cloud. The e0 is running EIGRP
> on
> >it & they leads to EIGRP IP cloud. All IP subnet
> >addresses have prefix of 180.99.X.X.
> >
> >The problem is when EIGRP is configured it grapes
> all
> >180.99.X.X interfaces (including the s0 & s1 IP
> >subnets) & sends them out. The requirement is to
> have
> >OSPF on 2 serials ONLY (this is easy since OSPF
> >network command is granular) & EIGRP is to run on
> e0
> >ONLY (this is where I need help since EIGRP network
> >command is NOT granular). I tried a distribute list
> >(distribute-list 99 out e0 with ACL denying the 2
> >serial subnets). But this stops OSPF to EIGRP
> >redistribution of these 2 subnets.
> >
> >Help please!
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:27 GMT-3