From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Nov 14 2001 - 18:04:32 GMT-3
Bryan,
If you're redistributing from isis into ospf and a connected interface is
included in isis, then that network should be redistributed into ospf. This
was something discussed on the list recently and I verified it with our
Developers, anything else is most likely a bug (for all routing protocols).
There have been bugs in the past have made many of us think "redistributed
connected" was necessary in that situation when the problem was really a bug.
Brian
Bryan Ginman wrote:
> Section 2 Task 2 states "configure ISIS type 1 between R5 and R14 " Yet in
> Task three it states to redist OSPF into ISIS as Type 2. That's fine but on
> the solutions routing table for R5 has L2 routes in it from OSPF??????? I
> checked the corrections on there page but didn't see anything for this one,
> if its a Level 1 circuit between R5 - R14 this can't be. Any help I'm
> assuming its a typo and should just be a Level-1-2 circuit.
>
> Also when redistributing ISIS into OSPF the connected interfaces don't show
> up unless you explicitly redist them, Am I missing something because on the
> solutions routing table in OSPF shows these interfaces/subnets redistributed
> in, yet no redist of connected interfaces has been entered on the ABR.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bryan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:15 GMT-3