From: Jim Brown (Jim.Brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2001 - 15:26:29 GMT-3
The first statement would deny all 140 routes and none of the other would
matter.
-----Original Message-----
From: SFeldberg@edeltacom.com [mailto:SFeldberg@edeltacom.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:55 AM
To: Courtney Alexander Foster
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; David; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Filtering & Wildcard
Your statement would that permit 140.0.0.0, 140.3.0.0 but not 141.2.0.0 and
142.3.0.0...
Try:
deny 140.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
deny 140.3.0.0 0.0.255.255
permit 140.0.0.0 3.3.255.255
Steve
"Courtney
Alexander To: "David"
<david_knot@yahoo.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Foster" cc:
<cfoster@cnr.e Subject: RE: Filtering &
Wildcard
du>
Sent by:
nobody@groupst
udy.com
12/07/2001
12:44 PM
Please respond
to "Courtney
Alexander
Foster"
140.0.0.0 0.3.255.255
-----Original Message-----
From: David
Sent: Fri 12/7/2001 12:04 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc:
Subject: Filtering & Wildcard
Guys
If u are asked to allow say 3 routes (140.1.0.0,
141.2.0.0 & 142.3.0.0) in to your rack from a
backbone. What type of wildcard would you use in ur
ACL. Would the following be the best?
access-list 1 permit 140.1.0.0 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit 141.2.0.0 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit 142.3.0.0 0.0.0.0
OR:
access-list 1 permit 140.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 1 permit 141.2.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 1 permit 142.3.0.0 0.0.255.255
?
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:40 GMT-3