From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki (karwas@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 19:56:33 GMT-3
John,
You are right, Caslow statements are right, inverse arp
is disabled for DLCI used in static map.
But it was very easy to chalenge this statement, by overlooking
a simple fact that even with inverse arp disabled, router can
aquire dynamic maps just by beeing passivly inverse arp queried
from the other side of PVC.
See my other post, and Jaeheon explanation.
Thanks,
Przemek
On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 12:42, John Spencer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Sorry I dont have routers at home and therefore can not show you any output
> examples. But the point is that I can confirm the issues mentioned in Mr
> Caslows book and others of a similar nature of the dynamic mappings being
> "lost" (also on 12 code and onwards)
>
> Personally I would not rely on inarp in a production environment. If you
> have a simple architecture you may be ok, but why take the risk.
>
> Here is all the info anyone should need:-
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/125/13.html
>
> Also how inarp works is a matter of an RFC standard
> ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2390.txt
>
> Regards
>
> John Spencer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:14 GMT-3