From: Lupi, Guy (Guy.Lupi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Feb 11 2002 - 15:48:22 GMT-3
They only need the mask native in RIP if they are in the same classful
network as the interface over which they are to be broadcast, is that what
you are seeing, that different masks in the same classful networks are seen
by RIP? If not this is the proper behavior, RIP can handle /32's.
~-----Original Message-----
~From: Steven Weber [mailto:itweber@earthlink.net]
~Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 12:55 PM
~To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
~Subject: RIP and Loopbacks in OSPF.......
~
~
~I made an interesting observation, I wanted to know if other people are
~experiencing the same thing, and the logic behind it. When
~redistributing
~between OPSF and RIP I noticed that the loopbacks in OSPF
~don't need to be
~summarized in order for RIP to see them. OSPF advertises a
~loopback as a /32
~by default and RIP has no problem with this. However, once I
~add the ip ospf
~network point-to-point command on the loopbacks thereby
~changing them from a
~/32 to their true mask, once again RIP cannot see them unless
~there is some
~sort of summarization or default route in place. I don't
~understand why RIP
~sees these routes as a /32, shouldn't they need the mask
~native to RIP in
~order to be seen in RIP ?
~
~Does anyone have insight on this one?
~
~Regards,
~
~Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:19 GMT-3