From: armreg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 11:55:52 GMT-3
Guys,
Thank You, for all your reponses.
Thanks
Antonio
"yuen me" <yuen_me@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I think the NAT is the issue which translates the router ID into something
>different. Try to use other access-list 100 in the ip nat:
>
>access-list 100 deny any tcp eq bgp ...
>access-list 100 perm any ....
>ip nat inside source list 100 ...
>
>let me know the result
>
>yuenme
>
>>From: armreg@netscape.net
>>Reply-To: armreg@netscape.net
>>To: RSiddappa@necbns.com, jamartinez@landata.payma.es,
>>ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>Subject: RE: RE: BPG and NAT issues
>>Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:37:22 -0500
>>
>>Sorry Guy,
>>
>>these are the configurations for R1 and R2.
>>
>>
>>
>>R1#sh run
>>Building configuration...
>>
>>Current configuration : 1645 bytes
>>!
>>version 12.1
>>service timestamps debug uptime
>>service timestamps log uptime
>>no service password-encryption
>>!
>>hostname R1
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>ip subnet-zero
>>no ip finger
>>ip tcp synwait-time 5
>>no ip domain-lookup
>>!
>>ipx routing 0001.0001.0001
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>interface Loopback0
>> ip address 15.15.1.1 255.255.255.0
>> ipx network 11
>>!
>>interface Ethernet0
>> no ip address
>> shutdown
>>!
>>interface Serial0
>> ip address 10.1.11.1 255.255.255.0
>> ip nat inside
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
>> ipx network 1401
>> frame-relay map ipx 1401.0014.0014.0014 301 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ip 10.1.11.1 301 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ipx 1401.0001.0001.0001 301 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ipx 1401.0003.0003.0003 301 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ip 10.1.11.14 301 broadcast
>> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
>>!
>>interface Serial1
>> ip address 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.0
>> ip nat outside
>>!
>>router ospf 1
>> log-adjacency-changes
>> redistribute static subnets
>> network 10.1.11.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
>> network 15.15.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
>> network 200.200.200.0 0.0.0.255 area 20
>>!
>>router ospf 100
>> log-adjacency-changes
>>!
>>router bgp 100
>> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> network 200.200.200.0
>> neighbor 200.200.200.2 remote-as 200
>>!
>>ip nat inside source list 10 interface Serial1 overload
>>ip classless
>>ip route 15.15.2.0 255.255.255.0 200.200.200.2
>>ip http server
>>!
>>access-list 10 permit any
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>ipx router eigrp 20
>> network 1401
>> network 11
>>!
>>!
>>ipx router rip
>> no network 11
>> no network 1401
>>!
>>!
>>ipx sap 4 f1server 11.000e.000e.000e 1 1
>>ipx sap 7 p1server 11.000e.000e.000e 1 1
>>!
>>!
>>line con 0
>> logging synchronous
>> transport input none
>>line aux 0
>>line vty 0 4
>> login
>>!
>>end
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>R2
>>
>>R2#sh run
>>Building configuration...
>>
>>Current configuration:
>>!
>>version 11.3
>>service timestamps debug uptime
>>service timestamps log uptime
>>no service password-encryption
>>!
>>hostname R2
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>!
>>interface Loopback0
>> ip address 15.15.2.2 255.255.255.0
>>!
>>interface Loopback1
>> ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>>!
>>interface Loopback2
>> ip address 1.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
>>!
>>interface Loopback3
>> ip address 1.1.3.1 255.255.255.0
>>!
>>interface Serial0
>> no ip address
>> no ip mroute-cache
>> shutdown
>> no fair-queue
>>!
>>interface Serial1
>> ip address 200.200.200.2 255.255.255.0
>> clockrate 125000
>>!
>>interface TokenRing0
>> no ip address
>> shutdown
>>!
>>router odr
>>!
>>router ospf 1
>> network 15.15.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 20
>> network 200.200.200.0 0.0.0.255 area 20
>> distribute-list 11 in Serial1
>>!
>>router bgp 200
>> no synchronization
>> network 1.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
>> network 1.1.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0
>> network 1.1.3.0 mask 255.255.255.0
>> network 200.200.200.0
>> neighbor 200.200.200.1 remote-as 100
>>!
>>ip classless
>>ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 200.200.200.1
>>!
>>access-list 11 deny any
>>!
>>line con 0
>>line aux 0
>>line vty 0 4
>> login
>>!
>>end
>>
>>
>>
>>RSiddappa@NECBNS.com wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Antonio,
>> >
>> >Can you send me the full configs.
>> >
>> >R.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: JOSE ANGEL MARTINEZ DE LA VARA
>> >[mailto:jamartinez@landata.payma.es]
>> >Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 10:20 AM
>> >To: 'armreg@netscape.net'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >Subject: RE: BPG and NAT issues
>> >
>> >
>> >Your TCP connections are not broken since you are in Open state. Halabi
>>book
>> >says in page 110 that in openSent or openConfirm the TCP connection IS
>> >stablished and the BGP OPEN message has been sent.
>> >
>> >I think your problem comes from the reuirements from BGP not from IP
>> >conectivity.
>> >
>> >I cannot see where your ASES start and end so I cannot give you more
>> >details.
>> >
>> >Funny work
>> >
>> >Jose Angel
>> >
>> >-----Mensaje original-----
>> >De: armreg@netscape.net [mailto:armreg@netscape.net]
>> >Enviado el: lunes, 11 de febrero de 2002 16:54
>> >Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> >Asunto: BPG and NAT issues
>> >
>> >
>> >Guys,
>> >
>> >I am having some problems with BGP and NAT configuration.
>> >
>> >
>> > Nat inside Nat outside
>> >
>> > 10.1.11.x/24 .1 .1 200.200.200.x /24 .2
>> >FR Cloud-------------------R1-----------------------------------R2
>> > BGP 100 BGP200
>> >
>> >BGP neighbors relationship stay in Open State, they never establish the
>> >full TCP connection. The Nat translation is breaking my TCP connections
>>for
>> >BGP neighbor. When I remove Nat Bgp neighbors between R1 and R2 get
>> >established. I have been trying any possible configuration for Nat but
>>keep
>> >breaking my TCP connections needed for BGP. Has somebody face this
>>problem
>> >before?
>> >
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >Antonio
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:20 GMT-3