IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?

From: Shadi (ccie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Feb 19 2002 - 15:39:48 GMT-3

• Next message: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW Cost command"
• Previous message: Steven Weber: "Re: 2500 flash problem"
• Next in thread: Frank Jimenez: "RE: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Maybe reply: Frank Jimenez: "RE: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Maybe reply: Jim Newton: "RE: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Maybe reply: Richard Wheat: "Re: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi all,

NX 97 [45][14/02][09/01] via 300.0000.0000.0001, 697s, Se0/1

What do we mean by the [45][14/02][09/01] in the above part from the IPX
routing table?

How IPX prefers the routes? based on distances or metrics or both?
I see it prefers EIGRP over RIP and NLSP over RIP.

Shadi

• Next message: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: DLSW Cost command"
• Previous message: Steven Weber: "Re: 2500 flash problem"
• Next in thread: Frank Jimenez: "RE: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Maybe reply: Frank Jimenez: "RE: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Maybe reply: Jim Newton: "RE: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Maybe reply: Richard Wheat: "Re: IPX Routing protocols and the Routing Table?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:27 GMT-3